Sunday, May 24, 2015

Oswald J. Castro Rivera: Thanks, Isaac Newton & Albert Einstein!

The universe is a highly complex and fascinating place. Everything is so intriguing and beautiful, starting from the things that today we already known up to the phenomena in nature that we do not understand yet and are a mystery to the human being. It is exciting to know how everything in the universe works so perfectly and in total harmony. Thanks to the study of physics and great scientists who devoted their lives to study the mysteries of the phenomena of nature, today we understand more about how everything works in the universe. 
                
The study of physics is extremely important and fascinating because basically everything that happens around us in our daily lives can be explained by the laws of physics. Also physics has been one of the most useful tools for humans to evolve. Even the technologies we use every day for transportation and our daily basis are thanks to the discoveries made by the physicists who dedicated their whole lives to the study of the natural phenomena in our planet and the entire universe. Is so amazing to know how things work around us and even more exciting, knowing why everything is so perfectly arranged in this way. 
               
Is interesting to know how Isaac Newton discovered many important laws of physics during his lifetime. For many people, he is considered the greatest genius that has existed in history. In an article I read some time ago I found that Isaac Newton was intrigued about the phenomena of nature more than anything, needless to say, he devoted much of his life studying it. He exposed many significant laws about physics and contributed with Gottfried Leibniz to the creation of the branch of mathematics known as calculus. Those findings helps greatly to the development of new technologies in today modern world and remain being the main useful tool for scientists and engineers, even though they were invented a long time ago.
               
Another story that I found inspirational is that of Albert Einstein. He was just a curious man that had the desire to understand more about the unknown. Sometime after, he become one of the most renowned physicists of our planet and even came to be considered a genius. One of the things that inspire me the most about him is that despite all of his failures during his life to explain the theory of relativity, he never gave up until he found a valid explanation and at the end with his perseverance he found it. 
               
In the articles and biographies that I have read during my life of some of the most prodigious physicists in history, I've noticed that curiosity and the desire to find answers to the unknown is basically the foundation of physics. The vast majority of these physicists were curious persons that liked understanding more about the mysteries of nature; even they were willing to sacrifice their entire lives just to accomplish their objectives of understanding more about it. With their perseverance and a lot of patience, they accomplished things that others could not do. We always see the great achievements of these great physicists and scientists, but rarely we look at the suffering and hard work that each one performed in order to achieve their goals.
             
Sometimes I think how our world would be today if any of these laws of physics and advanced math had not been discovered. Our present world would look a lot different than how it really looks today. Maybe we wouldn't have the methods of transportation we have today, or the technology that we use every day; we wouldn't know how the universe looks like or how it works, furthermore, humans would not be able to go outer space. We have to thank all of these geniuses that dedicated their time to find all this amazing discoveries.

Carynette Vega Quiñones: Picky Mirror

The sun, is constantly radiating light towards the Earth. This is our principal source of light, and is responsible of the perception of our surroundings. In places we don’t have the sun, humanity has created other artificial light sources. Mirrors reflects that light in a manner that, for incident light in a range of wavelengths, the reflected light has many or most detailed physical characteristics of the original light. Our ancestors used still water, or very polished minerals to see themselves, through the reflection of the light in those materials. In our daily lives, we encounter many mirrors. There is usually one in our room, in the bathrooms, cosmetics, and in our cars.

Many of our traditional mirrors contains a silvery layer (a metal, most of the times) that is the one that reflect the light. There are flat mirrors (reflecting the object as it is) and concave mirrors (which produce magnified images or diminished focus or simply distort the reflected image of the original object). The mirrors are also used in scientific apparatus such as telescopes, lasers, cameras and industrial machinery. Most mirrors are designed for visible light; however, mirrors designed for other wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation are also used. 

A new type of mirror is emerging, and it can reflect a desired single wavelength of light only. All others wavelength of light pass right through, without being reflected in it. This technology could be useful, not for the decorative and architectural purposes, but yes for other scientific issues; for example it could be used to make better satellite antennas. This mirror, is constructed of metamaterials, which are man-made materials that are made to have properties that materials found normally in the natural world do not exhibit. It was introduced in the March 6, 2015 Physical Review Letters, and it was created by Viktar Asadchy. 

Asadchy was born in Gomel, Belarus, in 1990. He received the Diploma degrees in physics from Gomel State University, and actually he is a researcher of Aalto University in Finland, department of electrical engineering. He and his team made this novel mirror, and consists of millimeter-sized loops of copper wire embedded in plastic. They discovered that by making different shapes with the wire provoke that particular wavelengths will be reflected by the mirror. Researchers illuminated the mirror with microwaves of 60-millimeter-wavelength microwaves. This microwaves induced a current through the wires, making them emit radiation that interacted with the other microwaves. By adjusting the sizes and shapes of the wires, the researchers could get the 60-millimeter-wavelength microwaves to reflect off the mirror at any angle. Microwaves at other wavelengths did not get reflected. The team also built a mirror that, can emulate a satellite television dish by reflecting and focusing microwaves toward a single point without the necessity of being curve. Viktar Asadchy future projections for this project are to create mirror with nano-sized wires that could reflect individual colors of visible light.

The material covered by the the mirror technology could help to take advantage of space in satellites, recollecting microwaves used for communication with Earth, but letting the sun’s light shine through, and could eventually replace expensive radio dishes used for communication, and astronomy. 

Bibliography
http://adirondackdailyenterprise.com/page/content.detail/id/551249/The-new-picky-mirror.html?nav=5257
http://meta.aalto.fi/people.html
https://student.societyforscience.org/article/new-mirror-picky-what-it-reflects?mode=topic&context=6
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/copper-wire-%E2%80%98metamirror%E2%80%99-reflects-selectively

Yasel Miguel Rivera Figueroa: Gravity

A couple of weeks back I go to the movie theater to watch the movie Interstellar. This movie is based basically in the end of the world and the efforts of the NASA to save the human race. In the movie NASA is trying to find a planet, in another galaxy, which can sustain the human race and then moved the human population over there using a four dimension wormhole as a shortcut. The main problem in the movie is the time. When traveling from a galaxy to another what is an hour there can be years back on earth. To resolve the movie issue they use the only thing that is constant in both dimensions, gravity. Gravity is a natural phenomenon by which all physical bodies attract each other. This phenomenon, more generally describe by the general theory of relativity exposed by Einstein, is although the weakness of the four fundamental forces but is a crucial factor in every physical body.

Gravity more common affects bodies that possess a defined mass such as objects, persons, animals, etc. Although it is proved that other bodies such as light, which doesn’t have any mass, is affected in a certain way by gravity. This has been proved repeatedly and Einstein even got a parade thrown in his honor for properly predicting it. What it means is that the path of light is affected by things that have a mass, such as the sun. So if a beam of light, say, a far off star passes close enough the sun, the gravity of the sun exerted on the star will make the star bend slightly around it. This will cause that an observer, like us, see the star in a different spot of sky than it’s actually located. Remember this the next time you look up at the stars, it could just be a trick of the gravity.

Another interesting fact about gravity is that isn’t equally even in our planet. Earth isn’t a perfect sphere because mass is distributed unevenly within the planet. The greater a concentration of mass is, the stronger its gravitational pull, creating deformations around the globe. The ice that once cloaked the area during the last ice age has long since melted, but the Earth hasn't entirely snapped back from the burden. Since gravity over an area is proportional to the mass atop that region, and the glacier's imprint pushed aside some of the Earth's mass, gravity is a bit less strong in the ice sheet's imprint. The slight deformation of the crust explains 25 percent to 45 percent of the unusually low gravity; the rest may be explained by a downward drag caused the motion of magma in Earth's mantle.

To conclude this interesting subject I can say that gravity is the reason we are attached to this planet. Most people have idea of what it is but very few know the real reasons why the things for what they work so hard aren’t floating in the air. Gravity is the main cause for an endless number of situations that occur both on Earth and in universe. Also is a factor that should always be kept in mind when working with displacements problems and even construction projects. It’s important that people start studying it; I believe a fallacy to live in such an interesting planet and to not have any idea of how it works. 

Hansel A. Montalvo Castro: Components of Matter: A Contradictory Mystery

In daily life, it is not difficult to understand the way that objects move or how they interact each other. If a ball is released from rest at any reference frame near the surface of the Earth, it is known that it will fall freely approximately with a gravitational acceleration. By the other hand, it can be described a more complex movement such as a car displacement, using mathematical analysis of energy and force interaction. However, when scientist try to understand how atoms, electrons and light behaves, it is noticed that it is not so easily as describing a macroscopic object. 

Curiously, there exists a contradictory phenomenon. It is not completely possible to use kinematics formulas in order to describe or predict how an electron will move. In fact, there is a principle that states it is impossible to know the position and momentum of particles at the same time. In addition, if more precisely the position of a particle is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be known. The previously statement is known as the Uncertainty Principle, formulated by Werner Heisenberg in 1927. Thinking about this fascinating principle, arises an interesting question: If objects are composed by particles as electrons; why objects do not behave at the same way electrons do? As it is observed in the Universe, it is impossible for an object to be at two places at the same time, however, the electrons comprising an object can be anywhere, almost at different positions simultaneously! At this point of the XXI century, it is difficult to be the first one on thinking about something. Back in history, scientists as Niels Bohr and Max Planck began to study particles and discovered new physics laws to describe the microscopic behavior of matter. Complex mathematics and experiments related to the movement of particles gave way to the development of quantum mechanics. However, the understanding and acceptation of stablished statements in this physics’ branch were controversial in the scientific community.

This controversy is not surprising, human beings are scientist by instinct, people base their knowledge and opinions in what they can see and prove by themselves. In fact, the great mind of Albert Einstein disliked the idea of accepting that the laws of motion left room for such vagueness related to the particles behavior. Einstein said: “God does not play dice with the Universe”. It was difficult to him to accept that the intuitively notion of the kinematic physics was not useful to describe particles and the sub-atomic world. Nevertheless, now days the majority of physicists today accept the laws of quantum mechanics as an accurate understanding of the particle behavior. The truth is that, no matter how contradictory is the movement behavior of the macroscopic world against the sub-atomic one, the laws used to describe both are functional now days.

However, it cannot be ignored that for many years, space and time were used to think as fixed and unchanging; but Albert Einstein made up to demonstrate that these physical dimensions are relative to the observer. What if it can demonstrate that not only space and time are relative to the observer, but also movement? It is already known that describing the position and velocity of an object depends of a reference frame. Then, what if this idea is extended for the complete analysis of motion itself? Maybe with this analysis it can be solved the contradictory behavior of the movement of particles against the movement of objects. Analyzing this idea, it can be stablished the following statement: Since particles are very small in comparison to visible objects, it is difficult to describe their movement as the same way kinematics describe objects motion itself. Likewise, if it is consider the physical world (our world) as very small against a bigger one, the objects movement will be difficult to understand as particles, coexisting the possibility that at great differences of sizes, from a bigger reference frame than the physical world, the objects movement is also uncertain. If it is imagine that a person is able to be small as a particle, that person will perceive the electrons and light movement as normally a person observes a car’s movement. As the same way, if it is imagine that a person is large enough to see Earth equivalent in size scale as a particle, the Earth movement will be also uncertain to describe. 

In conclusion, it can be mention that the idea stablished in this short essay it can sound incoherent and meaningless. However, it is part of a creative analysis and natural intuition. Maybe after all, objects motion is not different from the fundamental particles motion, but instead humans and objects can also behave as particles if they are observed from a large scale. There exist the possibility that if Earth is observed from far away in space, it will appear to move as an electron does. After all, mater is composed by particles and it cannot be surprising that objects behavior are determined by its constituent particles.

Omar A. Colon Batista: Gravity: Fatherless?

Gravity, by definition is a natural phenomenon by all physical bodies attracts each other. Here on Earth gravity gives weight to all objects giving a downward force to keep them stuck to the ground. Newton, in his study of universal gravitation postulates that the gravitational force of two bodies of mass is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. However Albert Einstein in 1915 published the general theory of relativity that generalizes special relativity and provides a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time, or spacetime. 

Newton postulates that gravity was a force that acts instantaneously plus any distance, but Einstein saw a problem with the theory because it arouse against his work about light and properties of spacetime. So in the contradiction between these to there are now two ways of thinking about gravity and space.

So in Newton’s theory, space is static and flat as Euclid’s law of geometry. Also that objects have a natural tendency to move on straight lines at constant speed. In gravitational force he discovers that there is a force acting on the planets called gravity. This gravitational force depends on a property called gravitational mass, mg (how we can see in the formula of gravitational force). In his second law of motion, that gives the acceleration in response to any force (not just gravity). The acceleration depends on a property that we call inertial mass, like in the formula a=F/m.

However Albert Einstein using his principles and his theory challenges the father of gravity.

In our theory books about physics we see examples like the following: If we are in an elevator, our body has a constant velocity, while the elevator accelerates upward. Another way of thinking, if the elevator is in a constant velocity, the body accelerates downward because of gravity.

In Einstein’s theory of light there are two ways of thinking: If the light has a constant velocity, the elevator accelerates upward. However if the elevator has constant velocity, the light is accelerating downward by gravity in his point of view.

For Einstein gravity affects the paths of photons; even though they have no mass. Mass and energy are interchangeable.

Light takes the shortest distance between two segments. The shortest distance is a straight line in flat space. In the presence of gravity light follows a curved line. So in the presence of gravity, space is not flat, but curved.

In conclusion, in Newton’s theory: gravity depends on the mass, to know how much force to exert. Force tells mass how to move. In Einstein’s theory: mass-energy tells space-time how to curve. So, has gravity’s effect been discovered 100%? Who is right? Has Einstein proved Newton wrong? Who is the true father of gravity?

Rafael A. Rivera Vazquez: Our planet and the gravity force

I often wonder, how would our planet without gravity. We have seen on television many times as astronauts float on other planets, and I would be like if we lived like this. We see the spacesuits used for subsistence and as they have to adapt to these conditions in this atmosphere. It is fascinating to see how the physical laws governing the universe and how the spacecraft can overcome the barrier of gravity and reach so distant planets.

The first approach about gravity was raised by Isaac Newton, who said that this is an instantaneous force. Newton was one of the first physicists seeking to find a complete explanation about gravity, however, although Newton's efforts were remarkable, 
and allowed explain the motion of the planets, there were other events that are not fully complied with their predictions.

Later the scientist Albert Einstein formulated a reasoning based on their theory that nothing can travel faster than light. So imagine the following scene, the sun emits its light and this comes to us about 8 minutes later, due to the distance that separates us, which is about 150 million kilometers. Now suppose the sun suddenly disappears, it is curious to know if this happens on earth we would still eight minutes of light. However, Newton claimed that gravity was an instant force and therefore disappear when the force of gravity that keeps the earth revolving around the sun disappears, so this would come out fired long before the light strike with to the earth. But after much reasoning Einstein came to a great explanation, which argued that where gravity was everywhere where a body exists, not as a force in itself, but as geometry, the presence of a body in space deformed "space-time" and this deformation was what attracted the bodies between them. Einstein deduced that space and time are deformed by the presence of a mass. 

Gravity is the force of attraction between two bodies that have mass, the greater the mass stronger gravity.

The Earth revolves around the sun, the moon around the earth. This is due to the gravitational force between these two bodies, both the moon and tide sun gravitation attract the sea, the moon with greater intensity. Thanks to gravity we have atmosphere, thanks to the atmosphere we have air, which enables us to live. The moon with greater intensity. But if gravity were suppressed on earth would end life mainly by the lack of air or would have to adapt to another way of life if possible. These are just some examples of how physics affects our lives, and how to meet and learn from it helps us to find solutions and solve problems.

Luis Osvaldo Lugo Vázquez: Newton Change the world

When little baby Isaac was born on January 4,1643 in Lilliputian English village, premature and small enough to fit into a quart pot, he wasn't expected to survive. Over passing that, Isaac Newton grew up a physicist and mathematician, and is considered as one of the great minds of his century and science revolution. Isaac Newton was the most important figure in the development of modern science. Whatever you may think of bridges, roads, cars, buildings, every machine in the entire Industrial Revolution it owes its origin to Newton's Law. He proved that light was not made of one color but that it was actually made of several colors arranged in a spectrum and that this light was actually made up of waves. Many people should think that Einstein was the significant figure in science but, Newton’s accomplishments were of astonishingly. Albert Einstein once said, “Nature to Newton was an open book, whose letters he could read without effort”. For starters, Newton helped developed what he called fluxions, which is now called calculus. This concept of mathematics Newton discovered, now can be used to find the answers to such many problems, such as finding the speed of a ball that has been thrown in the air at any moment in the balls flight. Through his formulas, ways were found to solve areas space occupied by anything placed along a curved surface. That was by far his greatest accomplishment in the field of math. Also, during the same time period a German mathematician named Gottfried Leibniz also discovered calculus. Now thanks to Newton’s and Leibniz's mathematicians and scientists were able to enter into new elements. Newton had even postulate by 1666,his famous three laws of motion which physics students study everywhere:  Inertia = In the absence of forces, ("body") at rest will stay at rest, and a body moving at a constant velocity in a straight line continues doing so indefinitely.  When a force is applied to an object, it accelerates. The acceleration a is in the direction of the force and proportional to its strength, and is also inversely proportional to the mass being moved.(F = ma)  "The law of reaction," is stated as "to every action there exists an equal and opposite reaction." In that moment Newton spend time relating those laws of motion with gravity. Later with astronomer Edmond Halley, Newton jump into the study of gravitational force in the 1670s and '80s. The result of Newton's research was his seminal work published in 1687, the Principia, considered by many as the greatest science book ever written. On the book Principia, Newton breaks down the workings of the solar system into "'simple"' equations, explaining away the nature of planetary orbits and the pull between heavenly bodies. In describing why the Moon orbits the Earth and not vice-versa (it's because the Earth is so much heavier), the book literally changed the way people saw the universe. He also invented the reflecting telescope. With all these things that Newton achieve I certainly thing he change the world. Finally I leave with a phrase that a Poet called, Alexander Pope wrote: Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night; God said, Let Newton be! and all was light

Jocsán O. Ruiz Rodríguez: Physics in Music

Physics is all around us, and yet we always overlook it. We see, hear or feel
something happen but never stop to question why. Physics will tell us why. Music plays
a part in everyone's lives. So much so that it is often overlooked and the technicalities of
it are unappreciated. Sure there are times when we listen carefully to the music behind
the songs we hear, we may focus on the rhythm or the harmonies, but we never think of
what it took to make the sounds that we are hearing. As a musician and electrical
engineer student, sounds around us make me think why and how they are produced in
certain pitch or certain frequency. I’ve been playing musical instruments since a very
young age and not always the desire to know more was in me but, since I started the
university and took physics class a whole new world was open right in front of me.
When I learned that physics explains the “how something occurs” and the “why
something occurs” then started to wonder how when plucking my guitar’s strings a
pleasant sound comes out of it. By doing some research I discovered some basic
physics principles that show me how the sound is made.

Sounds in general are produced when something vibrates and when something 
vibrates in the air it is called, traveling longitudinal wave and when a string vibrates it is
called a transverse wave, which can be heard by the human ear. Sound waves consist
of areas of high and low pressure called compressions and rarefactions, respectively.
The wavelength and the speed of the wave determine the pitch, or frequency of the
sound. Wavelength, frequency, and speed are related by the equation speed =
frequency * wavelength. Since sound travels at 343 meters per second at standard
temperature and pressure (STP), speed is a constant. Using the same equation we can
solve for frequency and get that it is determined by speed / wavelength. The longer the
wavelength, the pitch will be lower. The 'height' of the wave is its amplitude. The
amplitude determines how loud a sound will be. Greater amplitude means the sound will
be louder. When I learned these basic principles, I began to understand my guitar.
Accordingly to the tension on the guitar string the wavelength is going to be longer or
shorter. With more tension we will have less wavelengths, and with less tension we will
have more wavelengths. This is an indirectly proportional relation. The amplitude term
can be heard in the guitar by how hard the string is plucked. The harder the string is
plucked the bigger the amplitude, meaning that the sound will be louder. The softer the
string is plucked the amplitude will be much less, giving us a directly proportional
relation between the amplitude and the sound produced by the guitar string.

Learning these principles helped me understand my guitar a little bit more, but 
made me ask myself more, which lead me to think about the tension involved in guitar
strings. In class we have learn that normal tension force may be defined as T=ma, in
the 2nd Law of Newton, but for a guitar string it involves other quantities. The equation I
said earlier for speed changes when talking about the tension. Now we define it as V =
fλ = √(T/μ), T being the tension, μ being the mass per unit length and λ being the
wavelength. Solving for T gives us, T = μV2= μλ2f2 . The tension is now in terms of the
mass per unit length, the frequency and the wavelength. All three of these quantities are
easily solved for. The mass per unit length is the only variable that needs to be
determined experimentally. It is a straightforward measurement of the mass of a certain
length of string divided by the length. The frequency is determined by which of the six
strings on the guitar is being analyzed. The guitar has six strings and their frequencies
in (Hz) respectively are 82.41, 110.00, 146.83, 196.00, 246.94, 329.63 and the
wavelength depends on the scale-length (Ls)of the guitar which it is λ = 2Ls.

I think this is the beginning of much more research and discoveries that I will be
doing with music and sound. Analyzing music with your ear may be pleasing and fun but
analyzing it with physics opens a whole new world that never thought of. This feeling I
just described made me think of the multiverse theory first coined by William James in
the year 1895. I’m not saying I believe in that theory but who knows. With physics many
things can be discovered.

Bibliography:
Hollis, Benjamin. "Physics of Sound." The Method Behind the Music. 1 Jan. 1999.
Web. 3 Apr. 2015. .
Achilles, Daryl. "Tension of Guitar Strings." Https://courses.physics.illinois.edu.
12 Dec. 2000. Web. 3 Apr. 2015.
Guitar_String_Tension_Experiment.pdf>.

Cristian Rosado: Heat Death of the Universe: Reasons why it may or may not happen

Heat death is a suggested final state of the Universe in which it would not have free thermodynamic energy. In other words, the Universe would reach thermodynamic equilibrium and in consequence, its maximum entropy. When we see the term “heat death”, the first thing that comes to our minds is high temperature, but this theory does not imply any particular temperature. The hypothesis is developed from the ideas of William Thomson, a British mathematical physicist and engineer, also the “creator” of the Kelvin temperature scale. He took the theory of heat as mechanical energy loss in nature, as stated in the first two laws of thermodynamics, and extended it to larger processes in the Universe. This would happen if all available energy, such as energy from heat, moves to places of less energy, such as colder places. If this happens, there would be no heat transfer through the Universe, in consequence, no more work can be done or “extracted” from it. Every process in the Universe that consumes energy, including our Earth, would cease. Although this process would probably take an infinite time so that all the energy or heat would be equally distributed through the whole Universe, this theory makes sense when taking to consideration the first two laws of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics says that when energy passes as work, heat, etc., into or out of a system (when energy is transferred), its internal energy changes according to the law of conservation of energy, this statement suggests that energy is not totally transferred, some energy would remain with the initial system. Then we can say that after a lot of time, there would be less energy available to transfer until there would be none. The second law of thermodynamics states that in a natural thermodynamic process, the entropy or disorder of the system is always increasing, by knowing this, we can conclude that eventually it will reach a maximum entropy where no energy would be free to transfer. Even though this explanations make sense and have their scientific prove and laws, they are based on laws we apply to systems we have studied and we can control, the Universe is huge and we don’t know certainly if this laws would apply to it entirely, maybe there are unknown forces or sources of energy that human kind have not discovered yet. Other point that may make people think this can’t happen is the fact that universe is at constant expansion. If the Universe is always expanding, there would not be an equilibrium because there would always be more objects to transfer energy or more heat sources. Also it is proposed by Ludwig Boltzmann, an Austrian physicist and philosophe, in “The Second Law as a law of disorder” that in an expanding universe, the value of maximum entropy increases faster than the Universe gains entropy, causing the Universe to move further away from a heat death. It is hard to predict what would happen to the Universe, especially when we know so little about it, the heat death may be one option for the future of our Universe. 

Cynthia L. Rodriguez: Physics: The Golden Road of Curiosity

Amazingly, physics has been that engine to further my inspiration into pursuing vast thinking and reading of science. I have produced beyond my curiosity of life itself a lot of interest in questioning: “how is it done?”, “Why is it done in that way?”, “Can it be done in another type of form or explained with a new intriguing theory?”.

During most of my free time I browse and wander through libraries and the web in search of interesting articles and documentaries that can enlighten me and allow my mind to think freely of the possibilities life holds on for us. For instance, two of my major and most asked topics in physics are the ability of finding any human-habitable planets light-years away and black holes getting along with space and time.

You might ask yourself: “why these two topics together?”, the answer to that question will be given as you read this fascinating article of a student who’s curiosity frontiers have not been found. 

Some months ago, I was able to give a presentation explaining the Second Law of Thermodynamics and in that search I found an interesting video which explained why the earth was set exactly at that distance from the sun and the moon and why does is have its own rotational movement. This video spiked my curiosity about any other habitable planets in the universe. I kept on searching (leaving out of sight the thermodynamics presentation…), and I 

found that last year, a planet within its own habitable zone was discovered. I was shocked!
The article thoroughly explained that NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope (which measures the fraction of starlight that the planet blocks as it revolves around it) had discovered a planet similar to Earth which was named Kepler-186f. This planet has only a 10% of what the Earth’s size is. Kepler-186f was localized rotating around the Kepler star. Unlike the star that is more likely known, the Sun, these groups of stars are called M dwarfs. Because these types of stars are dimmer and cooler than the Sun, the habitable zone of the habitable planet is closer to them. This star also develops slowly in luminosity, so their habitable zones remain constant for billions of years. One of the most important facts of this discovery is that it is at a distance of 500 light-years away from our planet! 

This mixed and shocking discovery lead me to re-think on time and if there would be any possible way that we can have a “shortcut” that leads us to Kepler-186f. Along with this questioning, I began to think of Einstein’s Theory of general Relativity. In it he explained that objects with huge masses cause a characteristic distortion in space and time. This gigantic mass would cause a distortion in the space’s conformation, causing other near objects to incline their direction, better known as “gravity”. 

Being this said, I asked myself if black holes can be used as shortcuts to these other planets. I mean, there could be a very narrow possibility that this can happen, but there still lies that possibility. I kept on with this doubt and discussed it with a friend of mine who is currently pursuing his PhD in Physics in UPR Rio Piedras campus. I asked him: “Even though the pull of a black hole is of an enormous magnitude, if there could be any possible way that if not us, a type of material can be used to elaborate a certain type of lens that could resist the gravitational pull a black hole produces?” In response he said: “I would not know how to answer this and if it would be possible because we are talking about a magnitude that it is millions times stronger that any human can possibly create. Those forces are so strong that even whole galaxies are rotating around them!”.

He even told me that he believed that while you kept on falling inside this black hole, you are going to see many things in front of you that have fallen first. It is like seeing the entire history of the universe, all the way from the Big Bang to the distant future simultaneously.

With all of these amazing ideas and thoughts gathered I thought of different possibilities or ideas that can be used to find a more efficient possibility in order to get to those distant habitable planets in a shorter lapse of time. I strongly propose that materials of high endurance and efficiency should be studied in order to get the best out of them and create a microscopic lens which will travel through a black hole in order to gather more information related to these phenomena. I mean, can it really be possible?

Speed of light! We should grasp more information related to it. There has to be more to it that of what we already know. Maybe there could be a possibility of studying the speed of light and modifying its behavior so that we can obtain better results for this and further questioning and investigation. I have always said that everything in this earth, even the small grain of sand has more to it than what we know of. I also question myself, if it were possible to find other worlds within worlds, how would humankind, the one that we are mostly related to, react upon such fascinating discovery?

Just remember, the limit to think lies within each and every one of us. 


Alejandro M. García: “Title: 𝐿 = Φ+[𝑖𝜕𝜏 − 𝐻]Φ + Φ+ ∗ Φ ∗ Φ”

Humans looked into the stars at the beginning of time, and their mystery has baffled us
ever since. It was once thought that mankind would never be able to comprehend or even begin
to grasp the laws that govern our existence, yet we were able to prove ourselves wrong with
time, and through the minds of great physicist and scientists. In the same way, we will someday
be able to, but with the vastness and apparent unruly nature of space how would going beyond
the understanding of our galactic neighborhood even be possible, even more so manage, to
understand the laws that govern everything through a single equation. Physics has presented a
solution, an idea most commonly known as the String Theory, a theory that may within itself
hold the basis to achieve that which every physicist, even Einstein, most longs for, The Theory
of Everything.

Our journey begins in 1968 with physicist Gabriele Veneziano who found within one of
Leonhard Euler’s equation the explanation for Strong Nuclear Force, one of the fundamental
forces in physics. No one would have known it at that moment, but Veneziano had stumbled
upon something much greater. Euler’s equation eventually found its way to American physicist
Leonard Susskind who investigated it further because in it he saw the possibility for the
explanation of much more than the Strong Force. With time he started to realize that said
formula represented some kind of particles that had internal structure and could vibrate, an 
innovative theory compared to its other more common interpretation of point particles. He began
to understand this as a string connecting two points, much like a strand of energy, which could
not only stretch and contract, but could also oscillate. Considered too radical at his time, the idea
was dismissed and mainstream science continued to see particles as points, not strings.

Physicist continued to explore the behavior of microscopic particles by smashing them
together at high speeds and studying those collisions, experiments through which they soon
learned that there were far more particles that they had originally believed. This discovery lead to
new theories, the most popular of these being the Standard Model, a theory that consisted on the
existence of messenger particles which are to be exchanged between objects thus creating the
effect of a force. The theory however popular only managed to explain three of the fundamental
forces in physics -Strong Nuclear Force, Weak Nuclear Force, and Electro Magnetism- failing to
encompass the most familiar, Gravity. Overshadowed by the Standard Model, String Theory was
cast aside although some physicist persisted on this idea even though the deeper into it they went
the more issues surfaced. The most significant of these issues being: 1) it predicted a particle,
later named tachyon, that is considered unphysical due to that it is supposed to travel faster than
light, 2) there was a discovery that the theory required 10 dimensions, which at the time, even
theoretically, were considered more than there are, and 3) it had a massless particle which was
not seen in experiment. These predictions sounded preposterous to the science community and
therefore the theory was regarded as incorrect.

By 1973 only a few physicist, one of which was John Schwarz, were still working on
String Theory. Schwarz wrestled to solve String Theory’s numerous problems, among these the
prediction of a mysterious massless particle which had never been seen in nature, as well as
several mathematical inconsistencies. For multiple years Schwarz made variations to the formula 
in an attempt to make it work, but all seemed lost until he started to consider that perhaps his
equations were describing gravity. However, to make sense of this new idea he would have to
reconsider the size of these strands of energy. Through this new line of thinking the mysterious
particle Schwarz had been trying to eliminate, now appeared to represent a graviton, a theorized
particle that had been long searched for due to that it is believed to transmit gravity at a quantum
level. With this new discovery String Theory now provided solutions that its competing theory,
the Standard Model, lacked. Still, the scientific community had no reaction regarding his
discovery. However scarce his victory Schwarz believed more than ever that these theorized
strings held the key to the unification of the four fundamental forces in physics -Strong Nuclear
Energy, Weak Nuclear Energy, Electro Magnetism, and Gravity-.

Schwarz was later joined in his quest by scientist Michael Green, who shared his belief in
the theory, although, in the early 1980’s String Theory still had fatal flaws due to mathematical
anomalies. After five years of dealing with the task of solving these flaws, in 1984 Schwarz and
Green finally managed to free the theory of these anomalies thus proving that it had the
mathematical depth to encompass all four forces. As Einstein once dreamed, their latest
discovery made it so that the unification of these forces into a single equation, a Theory of
Everything, was now possible. No other theory at the time had managed such an achievement,
for which reason it became widely popular, its impact in the scientific community was such that
in less than a year the number of String Theorists multiplied by the hundreds. The new version of
the String Theory seemed capable of describing all the building blocks of nature.

The theory states that Quarks, the particles that make up everything in the universe, are
made of even smaller parts, infinitely more diminutive oscillating strands of energy that look like
strings. The key idea is that just as different vibrational patterns or frequencies of a single cello
string create what we hear as different musical notes, the different waves at which the strings
vibrate give the particles their unique properties, such as mass and charge. The new idea resolves
the conflict between the views of space brought forward by Quantum Mechanics and General
Relativity, as it virtually calms the activity in quantum mechanics to the point where it can be
more easily stitched to General Relativity. String Theorists believe to be fulfilling Einstein’s
dream of uniting all forces and all matter, but this theory contains an aspect that has avoided it
from achieving everyone’s acceptance. This aspect is that no experiment could ever prove or
disprove the theory due to the scales that are being studied. Making string theory even harder to
prove is the fact that in order for it to work, the complex equations require extra dimensions of
space. In fact, the mathematics of String Theory demand the existence of 10 dimensions, among
these the ones we all know of movement on vertical, horizontal, and diagonal planes, as well as
time.

Many physicists are still working on String Theory and its ever growing field of possible
applications. Among these applications it is found that the theorized wormhole, a shortcut
through space and time, might actually be possible. Going back to String Theory itself, the issue
of the extra dimensions has been tried to be explained mathematically with some success, while
in our physical world it is stated that these extra dimensions might just be beyond our perception.
String Theory, along with the possibility of unifying all the fundamental forces in physics
within a Theory of Everything, as well as the idea of the existence of more than four dimensions,
to me is mind-blowing. For said reason have I read articles, and looked up other types of media,
about these works on my spare time, finding physics ever more interesting in the process.

References
Kaku, Michio (1999). Introduction to Superstring and M-Theory (2nd ed.). New York, USA:
Springer-Verlag.
Greene, Brian (2000). The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest
for the Ultimate Theory. Random House Inc.
"A Timeline of Mathematics and Theoretical Physics." A Timeline of Mathematics and
Theoretical Physics. Web. 5 Apr. 2015.
/history3.html>.
"The History of the String Theory." Timetoast. Web. 5 Apr. 2015.
timetoast.com/timelines/the-history-of-the-string-theory>.
Wray, Kevin. "An Introduction to String Theory." (2011). Ebook.

Christian O. Feliciano Serrano: The light

As humans beings, we always have been curious about the mystery in the things that surround us, especially the daily events that can’t be explained that easily. Step by step as we expand our knowledge we learn that everything has a reason to be. It had happened that someone observes how something in the air is eventually attracted by the ground and realize that there is something that occurs every time, but what causes it? Or the situation in which a car is moving at a constant speed and stops when the driver wants to, but when we think about it in detail we realize the answer is more complex than just pressing the brakes. As those two examples, the world is full of common situations that have unusual explanations, wish makes the life of the curious exiting and more interesting. The majority of the people are conscious that the situations we study start to become an object of interest thanks to the observation of any particular aspect of something that caught the attention of our senses. Now, let’s focus on one of the senses, sight. Immediately after we open our eyes we are constantly receiving information from our surrounding, but what are the steps that are needed to be following in order to perceive the visual characteristics of an object as it is? What allows us to see the colors? What creates the colors or the rainbow itself? What allows us to see our reflection in a mirror or why the situation changes when it’s dark? All of those questions are part of our need to learn and they are all connected with one thing, the light.

But, what is the light? Using science of Physics as our tool we will try to solve many of our established unknowns. Properly speaking, the light is the radiation that spreads in form of waves in the empty space called electromagnetic wave. The color is related to the frequencies of the light in the spectrum called the visible spectrum with its wave lengths between 400nm to 750nm. More than 750nm and less than 400nm won’t be perceived by the human eye. Still, what is the light? In the beginning was well known that the light was pure and that the combination of the light with objects gives the colors, until scientific developed the prism. Through this tool scientists understood they were wrong about the white light. What we obtain from there, the white light is actually the combination of all the colors. Using the prism we can actually see the decomposition of the light in red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet. Another common example where it happens in nature is the rainbow. One drop of the rain works as well as a prism, spreading white light into the full spectrum. Each drop allows us to see just one color in the spectrum in our range of visibility. It is the combination of many drops reflecting one specific wave length which allows seeing the rainbow with all the colors in the spectrum. 

We now know what the light is, but how is it possible that we can see a particular color from an object? To answer this question we will return to the fact that the white light is formed by mixing all the colors. What occurs when the white light hits any surface is that when the light gets in contact with the surface all the colors are absorbed except the color that represents the color of the object itself. The colors that are not absorbed bounce away from the object. This action is what our eyes capture at the moment of seeing a color. We end up seen the color that wasn’t absorbed by the object. The colors that are absorbed have an energy that it’s never destroyed is transformed into other expression of energy such as heat. Another thing that creates curiosity is the fact that the light experiences changes in its direction each time it gets in contact with any surface. If the surface is smooth the incoming light ray will bounce resulting in a reflected ray, which has the same angle to the surface as the incoming ray, like it occurs when using a mirror. On the other hand, if the light ray gets in contact with a rough surface, the ray will reflect in many different directions which will cause the reflection to get diffuse as it occurs using a paper.

In conclusion, science, in our case Physics, can explain common events that have unusual explanations letting ourselves be guided by fundamental concepts. One of our most reliable senses, the sight depends not only in the capacity of our eyes; it depends in many physical aspects related with the light, what forms it and how it moves, things that we don’t usually think that happened. We use to think that the light is everywhere until it’s dark or that we instantly see it when we open our eye, but we don’t realize that just because the events are not easily captured by our senses, it does not mean they do not exist.


Steph Brunot: the theory of relativity

Einstein is considered the 20th century greatest scientist. He has given many contribution to many fields, but the theory that this paper focuses is on is the theory of relativity presented by Albert Einstein in 1905, and a fascinating time traveling theory. In general terms, the theory states that time is relative. In physics terms, the theory becomes a bit more complicated. There are three types of relativity:

1) Classical relativity
There is no object that is completely at rest or complete motion. This has to do mostly with the reference frame chosen by an individual. Even if you were to stand completely still, you would technically still be moving at a velocity of 40,320 km/h, which is the velocity of the earth.  If the earth were to come to a complete stop for 10 seconds, the human race would most likely go extinct due to the massive amount of carnage that would follow. Imagine, you are driving a car without a seatbelt and hit another car, you would without a doubt fly out of the car and hit the pavement, but the velocity of your short flight would the same as the velocity your car prior to the crash. 
2) Time dilation and space contraction
Einstein managed to find a way to slow down time. In order to better explain this, an example is needed. Imagine you were to have two mirrors in which a light beam was being reflected off both, and another set, of the same objects. Now one of the sets have begun to move near the speed of light, which is 299,792,458 m/s. The light beam of the moving set would actually travel a larger distance, but since the speed of light is constant, it would need a larger time to complete it, therefore making time, relative the other set that is at rest, slower. Although, Einstein observed that when objects moved faster their height would become contracted, therefore actually shortening the distance previously mentioned

Time has actually already slowed down in 2006 worldwide thanks to the three gorges dam built in china. It raised the sea level 175m above sea level which has the same effect of a figure skater that moves their hands away from their center in order to slow themselves down. The earth is actually moving 0.06 microseconds slower than it used to prior to the contraction of the dam.

Now to mention the theory stated before. Physicist compare space to a long sheet of paper. When a huge mass is place somewhere on the paper, all object dropped after will converge to that location. Such is the theory behind black holes; a star that has gotten so big, and it simply attracts everything that goes beyond its boundary, or event horizon as stated by Hawking. Now, let us assume that an object were to dropped inside of a black hole. It would be failing inside of it at a certain velocity that, conveniently, would be the 60 to 90 percent the speed of light. Inside of that black hole, our object would be traveling at a larger distance and therefore would take more time. Therefore that hypothesis states that black holes are actually capable of traveling to the future relative to our current concept of time. The next question in this problem, is how big the black hole actually needs to be. The mass of a black hole is directly proportional to its event horizon.

Sadly it’s only a hypothesis. Man will possibly be able of time travel but it will not be in the near future considering that we are still trying to populate other planets. It would most likely take billions and decades before we can even fathom the existence of black holes and its relationship to relativity.

Brian E. Muñoz Peña: ¿Serán todas las leyes de la física y los principios antiguos tan certeros como pensamos?

Me interese en este tema porque había leído una noticia que capto mi atención, la cual tiene que ver directamente con esta ley. Newton, era un físico británico el cual dio a conocer las tres leyes del movimiento de Newton publicando su formulación matemática en su obra Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, en el 1687. La segunda ley de Newton, de la cual trata este artículo, nos dice que una fuerza neta ejercida sobre un objeto puede aumentar su rapidez o si la fuerza neta tiene un sentido opuesto al movimiento, la fuerza reducirá la velocidad del objeto. En otras palabras, si alguna fuerza externa actúa sobre el objeto en movimiento este aumentará o disminuirá su velocidad, dependiendo en qué dirección sea ejercida la fuerza. La aceleración de un objeto de acuerdo a esta ley es directamente proporcional a la fuerza ejercida. Ahora veremos porque me incline a hacer este artículo sobre la segunda ley de Newton. 

Las leyes de Newton son unas que desde el comienzo han sido consideradas como “perfectas”, como diciendo que así se rigen las cosas en el universo y ya. Pero al leer una noticia sobre partículas subatómicas auto acelerándose sin ninguna fuerza externa, me pregunto si de verdad son todos esos principios antiguos son tan certeros como pensamos. Al parecer no tanto para las generaciones nuevas de físicos. Para explicarles, en el año 2007, se inició un proyecto que demostró que bajo ciertas condiciones especiales la luz puede moverse a lo largo de una trayectoria curva y según principios antiguos la luz siempre viaja en línea recta. Científicos de Israel y los Estados Unidos han estado trabajando en este proyecto y también han encontrado que se puede inducir a partículas subatómicas a acelerarse por sí mismas casi a la velocidad de la luz, sin ningún tipo de fuerza externa, lo cual aparentemente “elude” la segunda ley de Newton.

Quien diría que después de siglos estas leyes y principios que veíamos tan certeros ahora pudieran tener algunas modificaciones o variaciones debido a la física moderna. De acuerdo a la noticia para lograr este concepto de auto aceleración de partículas “se basa en el comportamiento relativista de las partículas fundamentales, tales como los electrones, en términos de una estructura de onda” (Noticias de la ciencia y tecnología). Este equipo de investigación descubrió que manipulando la estructura de onda del modo adecuado, podría ser posible causar que los electrones se comporten contrario a la lógica común. Y esta manipulación de onda se podría lograr utilizando mascaras diseñadas especialmente con un concepto similar a las usadas para los hologramas pero en una escala menor. El electrón ganara cada vez más y más velocidad lo cual, como fue antes mencionado, podría llegar casi a la velocidad de la luz. 

Pienso que ahora pueden entender por qué tome este tema, que lo veo súper importante considerando la importancia que siempre han tenido estas leyes y principios en la física y en el universo. Este descubrimiento seguirá abriendo puertas a hallazgos nuevos, es obvio, y ayudara a entender más sobre las tantas cosas que todavía nos falta por descubrir, conocer y analizar en este universo tan variado y en el cual lo que aparenta ser algo “perfecto”, como estas leyes, puede tener variaciones o discrepancias siglos después. 

Philip Grossweiler: Development of the Law of Universal Gravitation

The theory of gravitational attraction states that objects are attracted to each other with a force that is proportional to the product of their masses. The development of this law spans hundreds of years, from the time it was first theorized, to the time it was refined, perfected, and proved. 

In the 4th century B.C., Aristotle believed that there was no effect on motion without a cause; therefore the cause of downward motion of heavy objects was related to their nature and that objects moved to their “natural place”.  Again a Roman engineer later theorized a similar rule, that gravity is not dependent on weight, but instead on nature. Brahmagupta formed a contradicting argument which stated that earth was spherical and attracted objects downward. Many years passed before any more major developments or proposed theories to why objects accelerate downward or anywhere.

The next notable development in the theory of the law of universal gravitation was Galileo who hypothesized that all objects accelerated equally when falling; therefore directly contradicting the theory given by Aristotle. Isaac Newton used Robert Hooke’s idea that gravitational force depends on the inverse square of the distance. He published his findings in the Principia which can be summarized as if the force of gravity pulling down on an apple reaches to the highest tree, could that force possibly reach all the way to the moon, which would then mean that the orbit of the moon around the earth would be a consequence of the Gravitational force. Using the theory of universal gravitation, Newton was able to prove the astronomical observations made by Kepler. This theory further garnered success when it was used to hypothesize the existence and position of Neptune and its orbit based solely on the movements of Uranus. Newton was able to describe gravity and its effects, but was unable to define the reason behind it.

Albert Einstein was the first to be able to determine why gravity worked the way it did. In 1905, Albert Einstein developed his “Special Theory of Relativity”. The “Special Theory of Relativity” showed how Newton’s three laws of motion were correct until the velocity approached the speed of light. In 1915, Albert Einstein published his “General Theory of Relativity” which proposed a new theory about gravity and again showed how Newton’s theory was correct, this time about Gravitational Energy, until there is a presence of very strong gravitational fields. In the “General Theory of Relativity”, he describes gravity as being more than just a force, and that instead is a consequence of mass’s influence in space. Newton and Einstein both believed that space had three dimensions, but where Newton believed that space was not able to be influenced, Einstein proposed that mass can warp, bend, push, or pull space, and that gravity was the outcome of mass existing in space. Today, it is widely accepted that Einstein’s theories are correct, but are not necessary unless dealing with speeds approaching the speed of light or extremely large gravitational fields; in all other cases, Newton’s laws will suffice.

Luis C Colon Collazo: Physics

At the beginning of the semester I was really motivated to take this physics class. I always make myself a lot of questions about many things in life. How things work or why that thing happened are some examples of those. With the knowledge acquired in this few months of class I have been able to answer a few of those questions.  During my life I have been a big fan of cars, I loved everything related to them from the acceleration, handling, braking and even the ability to stay stable during curved. Everything of the performance of the vehicle can be known using physics. By doing test on them you can actually improved in many ways their performance. When we think about performance in a vehicle, speed is often and attribute that comes to our minds.  Drag force and horsepower are the most important factors influencing the speed of a performance vehicle. Drag force is equal to: (1/2)Crav^2 being the C= coefficient of friction, r= density of air, a= area and v= Velocity in the drag formula. The c and r does not change so that leaves the designer to work with the designed of the vehicle. They usually work with lowering the rooflines, and angling all body surfaces away from the upcoming drag force. In the other side horsepower measures how much force the engine can apply to car in a given amount of time. Horsepower is measured in Watts and 1 horsepower is equivalent to 746watts. One thing I was always questioning myself was how the brakes system work. Because to me was very impressive to think that we only put a little amount of force pressing the brake pedal and it makes a huge amount of force to make the car stop in a few seconds only. In class I learn more of how this works and it answer my long time questions. The force from the pedal is multiplied and translated to hydraulic fluid pressure and that way the car had enough force exerted to the brake pads to make it stop. The automotive industry has come a long way since the first engine was built and put into a car, but the perfect car is still a long way off, we still have many more years of working with physics to improve the way in which our automobiles work.  

Physics to me is one of the most important sciences if not the most important.  With it, we can answer a very large amount of question about things we see and go through in our lives. Is very difference between when people see physics from the outside and when other people like us in the class that actually learned physics, know the equations to help solved those things we normally make questions like “how those that work?” or “why? is it like that”.  Learning physics these semester have been pretty awesome, I would make my best efforts to finish the class with a good grade and to learn more in the last part of the semester. 

Geraldo Lopez Rosa: I love Physics

Physics, this is by far the most interesting science of all, in my opinion. There’s just so much to talk about when I think of physics. Since I was in high school, I’ve always viewed physics as something very interesting. I’m not a person that reads magazines or journals online of physics. Physics isn’t my greatest skill, but it’s fun. I do read physics textbooks to learn more and also to study for my classes. There is physics everywhere.  

There truly is physics everywhere, for example in my Java Programming class we have a project on making a game. Guess what the project requires? PHYSICS! I have to make a ball move and collide with objects. To make the collision perfects, to get the correct angles and the force each object exerts.  I had to look over newton’s laws of motion.  

I love reading about gravity also. Gravity is very particular. One of the most fascinating things for me is how gratuity keeps the earth and all the other planets in orbit around the sun and the moon around the earth.  Newton had to be very smart to think of this. It’s very curious how the first person came up with this. The people that made all of these theories and principles had to be geniuses.  If people knew how much they would weigh in Mars they would be buying a space ticked right about now.  I would weight like 50 pounds in mars, thanks to gravity. 

I love reading about work. Work isn’t so fun, but with physics it is. So if you try to push a wall, you may be sweating but physics wise you haven’t done any work. I love how you think energy is destroyed but really you are just transferring energy.  Suppose you are moving a table, and you want to get the work done.   There are looks of things to look at, like normal force, gravitaonal force, tension, and kinetic friction. Here we see how a lot of things are related. 

One of the things that I have been learning is about quantum physics. It’s very interesting all of this. Looking at thing from the smallest of scales. It seems crazy. Everything in the level of atoms and how atoms behave is very interesting and something that I would love to keep reading about and learning more about this. The idea of time traveling with quantum physics is crazy maybe if I keep studying physics I make it possible (just a thought). 

Another interesting thing is the relative frames. If I’m sitting right now, writing this article, relative to the ground I’m at rest, but relative to the sun I’m moving. When you are in your car and see the moon moving. Is the moon moving? Are you moving? What is happening? All of that has to do with relativity. 

Physics may not be my best skill, but anyone who says physics is boring is stupid and doesn’t know any physics. There are very interesting things in physics and you can do a lot of things by understating physics. Physics isn’t only gravity or force, it has many areas. This is something you will need in your life since it is everywhere you look.